Skoda Superb 2002 vs Chevrolet Evanda 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Evanda is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Superb engine produces 16 HP less power than Chevrolet Evanda, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Chevrolet Evanda. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.8 | |
| Skoda Superb consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Evanda, which means that by driving the Skoda Superb over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
| Skoda Superb is 3 cm longer than the Chevrolet Evanda, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 1.4 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Evanda, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Evanda has
| |