Skoda Superb 2004 vs Volvo S60 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 285 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Superb engine produces 33 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Superb consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Superb consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
910 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
Skoda Superb is 17 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 380 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo S60, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`110 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 7400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |