Skoda Superb 2002 vs Chrysler Sebring 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 101 HP | 203 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 262 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Chrysler Sebring is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Superb engine produces 102 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Chrysler Sebring. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 10.4 | |
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Superb consumes 4.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Skoda Superb over 15,000 km in a year you can save 735 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.84 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.39 m | |
Skoda Superb is smaller, but higher. Skoda Superb is 4 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.6 metres more than that of the Chrysler Sebring, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |