Skoda Superb 2002 vs Chevrolet Epica 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Epica is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Superb engine produces 49 HP less power than Chevrolet Epica, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Chevrolet Epica. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica, which means that by driving the Skoda Superb over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Superb consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
| Skoda Superb and Chevrolet Epica are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Epica, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |