Skoda Superb 2002 vs Chevrolet Evanda 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Skoda Superb) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chevrolet Evanda) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Superb engine produces 1 HP less power than Chevrolet Evanda, but torque is 104 NM more than Chevrolet Evanda. Despite less power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 8.8 | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Superb consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Evanda, which means that by driving the Skoda Superb over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Skoda Superb 2002 1.9 engine: A reliable engine when using quality oils. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
| Skoda Superb is 3 cm longer than the Chevrolet Evanda, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 1.4 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Evanda, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Chevrolet Evanda has
| |