Skoda Superb 2004 vs Chevrolet Evanda 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Superb engine produces 19 HP more power than Chevrolet Evanda, whereas torque is 29 NM more than Chevrolet Evanda. Thanks to more power Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.6 | |
| Skoda Superb consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Evanda, which means that by driving the Skoda Superb over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Skoda Superb 2004 1.8 engine: The weakest link in this engine is the turbine, whose failure is contributed to by a faulty catalytic converter. The oil pump and chain tensioner also tend to have problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
| Skoda Superb is 3 cm longer than the Chevrolet Evanda, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 1.4 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Evanda, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Chevrolet Evanda has
| |