Skoda Superb 2006 vs Audi A6 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Audi A6 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Superb engine produces 17 HP less power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Audi A6. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Superb consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A6 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A4 | Used also on Audi A4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Superb might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Skoda Superb is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Superb is 12 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 546 litres | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Skoda Superb has 84 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi A6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`235 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Audi A6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Superb has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Audi A6, so Audi A6 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Audi A6 has
| |