Skoda Superb 2006 vs Honda Accord 2008
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
Skoda Superb is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Superb engine produces 13 HP more power than Honda Accord, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.6 | |
The Honda Accord is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Superb consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 330'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Superb engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 7 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A4 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda CR-V, Honda Civic | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Skoda Superb engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
Skoda Superb is 7 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 467 litres | |
Skoda Superb has 5 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.8 metres more than that of the Honda Accord, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Honda Accord has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Superb, so Honda Accord quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 2200 | 4000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Honda Accord has
| |