Skoda Superb 2006 vs Opel Astra 2012
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Opel Astra is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Superb engine produces 25 HP less power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Opel Astra. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Astra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Superb consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Superb consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Opel Astra 2012 2.0 engine: The Opel 2.0 CDTI A20DTH is a strong and efficient diesel engine that delivers good performance and reasonable fuel consumption. However, it also has several well-known weak points that require attention if long service life is expected. With proper care the engine can cover high mileage, but neglecting maintenance ... More about Opel Astra 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.51 m | |
| Skoda Superb is 38 cm longer than the Opel Astra, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1235 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Skoda Superb has 92 litres more trunk space than the Opel Astra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.3 metres more than that of the Opel Astra. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`103 kg | 1`870 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`443 kg | 1`373 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 660 kg | 497 kg | |
| Skoda Superb load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem more than Opel Astra. Therefore, Skoda Superb is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Opel Astra has
| |