Skoda Superb 2006 vs Chevrolet Epica 2007

 
Skoda Superb
2006 - 2008
Chevrolet Epica
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 140 HP150 HP
Torque: 320 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds9.7 seconds
Chevrolet Epica is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Superb engine produces 10 HP less power than Chevrolet Epica, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.36.1
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Skoda Superb is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 30 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Superb consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle1060 km in combined cycle
950 km with real consumption940 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.80 m
Width: 1.76 m1.81 m
Height: 1.47 m1.45 m
Skoda Superb and Chevrolet Epica are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 462 litres480 litres
Skoda Superb has 18 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Epica, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`600no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 20002400
Pros and Cons: Skoda Superb has
  • lower price
Chevrolet Epica has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv