Skoda Superb 2006 vs Skoda Fabia 2004
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Superb engine produces 35 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Superb consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Skoda Superb is larger. Skoda Superb is 58 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 11 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Superb is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 426 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1225 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Skoda Superb has 36 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 1.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`660 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Superb has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |