Skoda Superb 2008 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Superb engine produces 30 HP more power than Volkswagen Passat CC, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volkswagen Passat CC. Thanks to more power Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Superb consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 1140 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Passat CC might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volkswagen Passat CC 2008 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Passat CC 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
| Skoda Superb is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat CC, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Skoda Superb has 33 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means Skoda Superb can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat CC has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 5400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |