Skoda Superb 2013 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 260 HP | 300 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 5.5 seconds | |
Volkswagen Passat CC is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Superb engine produces 40 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat CC, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 9.3 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
850 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
610 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | no data | |
Width: | 1.82 m | no data | |
Height: | 1.46 m | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 532 litres | |
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Superb has 33 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. The Volkswagen Passat CC may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`265 | 2`130 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | low | |
Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat CC has serious deffects in 200 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 17 200 | 15 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |