Skoda Superb 2013 vs Renault Laguna 2013
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Skoda Superb engine produces 35 HP less power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Renault Laguna. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Superb consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Skoda Superb is larger. Skoda Superb is 14 cm longer than the Renault Laguna, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Superb is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Skoda Superb has 115 litres more trunk space than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`117 | 2`076 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |