Skoda Superb 2013 vs Kia Optima 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 325 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Superb engine produces 4 HP more power than Kia Optima, but torque is 5 NM less than Kia Optima. Thanks to more power Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Optima is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Optima, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1550 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 1060 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Optima gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Superb and Kia Optima are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 505 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Skoda Superb has 60 litres more trunk space than the Kia Optima. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia Optima. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`117 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Skoda Superb scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Kia Optima has
| |