Skoda Superb 2013 vs Honda Accord 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 188 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 247 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Skoda Superb engine produces 36 HP less power than Honda Accord, but torque is 3 NM more than Honda Accord. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.1 | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Superb consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that by driving the Skoda Superb over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Superb is 2 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 595 litres | 447 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Superb has 148 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord. The Honda Accord may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`071 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Honda Accord has
| |