Skoda Superb 2013 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Skoda Superb and Volkswagen Passat CC have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.3 | |
| Skoda Superb consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means that by driving the Skoda Superb over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 595 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Superb has 63 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. The Volkswagen Passat CC may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`071 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat CC has serious deffects in 200 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |