Skoda Superb 2013 vs Skoda Superb 2015

 
Skoda Superb
2013 - 2015
Skoda Superb
2015 - 2019
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 152 HP180 HP
Torque: 250 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.7 seconds8.1 seconds
Skoda Superb 2015 is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Superb 2013 engine produces 28 HP less power than Skoda Superb 2015, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Skoda Superb 2015. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.15.5
The Skoda Superb 2015 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Skoda Superb 2013 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb 2015, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb 2013 could require 240 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 840 km in combined cycle1200 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway1290 km on highway
Skoda Superb 2015 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.84 m4.86 m
Width: 1.82 m1.86 m
Height: 1.46 m1.47 m
Skoda Superb 2013 is smaller.
Skoda Superb 2013 is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb 2015, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 595 litres625 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1700 litres1760 litres
Skoda Superb 2015 has more luggage space.
Skoda Superb 2013 has 30 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb 2015. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Superb 2015 (by 60 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Superb 2013 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb 2015, which means Skoda Superb 2013 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`071 kg2`030 kg
Net weight:1`508 kg1`410 kg
Load capacity:563 kg620 kg
Skoda Superb 2013 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than Skoda Superb 2015. Therefore, Skoda Superb 2015 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety:
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 840017 600
Pros and Cons: Skoda Superb has
  • lower price
Skoda Superb has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv