Skoda Superb 2013 vs Renault Laguna 2013
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Superb engine produces 2 HP more power than Renault Laguna, but torque is 90 NM less than Renault Laguna. Thanks to more power Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Superb consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 405 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Superb consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1510 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1700 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 1070 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Skoda Superb is larger. Skoda Superb is 14 cm longer than the Renault Laguna, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Superb is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 595 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Skoda Superb has 145 litres more trunk space than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`059 | 2`025 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |