Skoda Superb 2010 vs Renault Laguna 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Skoda Superb engine produces 5 HP less power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Renault Laguna. Despite less power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Superb consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Skoda Superb is larger. Skoda Superb is 4 cm longer than the Renault Laguna, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Superb is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 633 litres | 508 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1865 litres | 1593 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Skoda Superb has 125 litres more trunk space than the Renault Laguna. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Superb (by 272 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`157 kg | 2`107 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`519 kg | 1`595 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 638 kg | 512 kg | |
| Skoda Superb load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem more than Renault Laguna. Therefore, Skoda Superb is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |