Skoda Superb 2010 vs Mazda 6 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Superb engine produces 7 HP more power than Mazda 6, but torque is 10 NM less than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Superb consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda CX-7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Superb might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Skoda Superb engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Superb is 5 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Superb is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 603 litres | 519 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1751 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Skoda Superb has 84 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 1 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Skoda Superb can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`157 | 2`145 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Superb has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |