Skoda Superb 2010 vs Ford Mondeo 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Superb engine produces 30 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Superb consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Mondeo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | Used also on Ford Galaxy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Superb might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.51 m | |
| Skoda Superb and Ford Mondeo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 603 litres | 489 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1680 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Skoda Superb has 114 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Skoda Superb can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`157 | 2`320 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |