Skoda Superb 2010 vs Volkswagen Passat 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Superb engine produces 30 HP more power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volkswagen Passat. Thanks to more power Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Superb consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Superb consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1340 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1550 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 1060 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Passat might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volkswagen Passat 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Passat 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Superb is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 603 litres | 603 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Skoda Superb can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`157 | 2`210 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |