Skoda Superb 2013 vs Volkswagen Passat 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Superb engine produces 20 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volkswagen Passat. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Superb consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Superb consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Superb is 7 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 633 litres | 651 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1865 litres | 1780 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Skoda Superb uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Superb (by 85 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`125 kg | 2`130 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`562 kg | 1`475 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 563 kg | 655 kg | |
| Skoda Superb load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem less than Volkswagen Passat. Therefore, Volkswagen Passat is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |