Skoda Superb 2013 vs Mazda 6 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Superb engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Superb consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 1630 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Superb is 3 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 633 litres | 522 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1865 litres | 1664 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Skoda Superb has 111 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Superb (by 201 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`117 kg | 2`090 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`631 kg | 1`485 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 486 kg | 605 kg | |
| Skoda Superb load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem less than Mazda 6. Therefore, Mazda 6 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |