Skoda Superb 2013 vs Volkswagen Passat 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Superb engine produces 100 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 180 NM less than Volkswagen Passat. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that by driving the Skoda Superb over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Superb consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Superb is 7 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 633 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1865 litres | 1780 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Skoda Superb uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Superb (by 85 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`117 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`631 kg | 1`735 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 486 kg | 575 kg | |
| Skoda Superb load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem less than Volkswagen Passat. Therefore, Volkswagen Passat is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |