Skoda Superb 2015 vs Volvo S90 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
| Skoda Superb and Volvo S90 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Superb consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Skoda Superb is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Superb is 10 cm shorter than the Volvo S90, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 625 litres | 500 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Superb has 125 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S90. The Volvo S90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 1 metres less than that of the Volvo S90, which means Skoda Superb can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`245 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo S90 scores higher in safety tests, butSkoda Superb is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo S90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |