Skoda Superb 2015 vs Ford Mondeo 2014

 
Skoda Superb
2015 - 2019
Ford Mondeo
2014 - 2018
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 340 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 seconds9.9 seconds
Skoda Superb and Ford Mondeo have the same engine power, but Skoda Superb torque is 10 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.44.8
Real fuel consumption: 6.2 l/100km6.6 l/100km
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Skoda Superb over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Superb consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo.
Fuel tank capacity: 66 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1490 km in combined cycle1310 km in combined cycle
1060 km with real consumption950 km with real consumption
Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.86 m4.87 m
Width: 1.86 m1.85 m
Height: 1.47 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Superb is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Superb is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 625 litres458 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1356 litres
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Superb has 167 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The Ford Mondeo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Skoda Superb can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0452`270
Safety:
The Skoda Superb scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
low

low
Skoda Superb has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 19 60011 400
Pros and Cons: Skoda Superb has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
Ford Mondeo has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv