Skoda Superb 2015 vs Volvo S90 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Superb engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo S90, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Volvo S90. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S90, which means that by driving the Skoda Superb over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Superb consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1490 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Skoda Superb is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Superb is 10 cm shorter than the Volvo S90, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 625 litres | 500 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Superb has 125 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S90. The Volvo S90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 1 metres less than that of the Volvo S90, which means Skoda Superb can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`045 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo S90 scores higher in safety tests, butSkoda Superb is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo S90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 21 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |