Skoda Superb 2013 vs Renault Laguna 2013
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Superb engine produces 10 HP less power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Renault Laguna. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.5 | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Superb consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1510 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1700 km on highway | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Renault Laguna 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Skoda Superb is larger. Skoda Superb is 14 cm longer than the Renault Laguna, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Superb is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 595 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1700 litres | 1377 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Skoda Superb has 145 litres more trunk space than the Renault Laguna. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Superb (by 323 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.6 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`172 kg | 2`025 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`554 kg | 1`493 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 618 kg | 532 kg | |
| Skoda Superb load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem more than Renault Laguna. Therefore, Skoda Superb is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |