Skoda Superb 2013 vs Skoda Superb 2010

 
Skoda Superb
2013 - 2015
Skoda Superb
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 160 HP160 HP
Torque: 250 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 seconds8.7 seconds
Skoda Superb 2013 and Skoda Superb 2010 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Skoda Superb 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.17.3
The Skoda Superb 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Skoda Superb 2013 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb 2013 could require 120 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
930 km on highway1000 km on highway
Skoda Superb 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.83 m4.84 m
Width: 1.82 m1.82 m
Height: 1.51 m1.51 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Superb 2013 and Skoda Superb 2010 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 633 litres633 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1865 litres1865 litres
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Superb 2013 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb 2010, which means Skoda Superb 2013 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`172 kg2`096 kg
Net weight:1`609 kg1`458 kg
Load capacity:563 kg638 kg
Skoda Superb 2013 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Skoda Superb 2010. Therefore, Skoda Superb 2010 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 86005600
Pros and Cons: Skoda Superb has
  • has 4x4 drive
Skoda Superb has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv