Skoda Superb 2019 vs Jaguar XF 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 380 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 5.3 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Superb engine produces 230 HP less power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 200 NM less than Jaguar XF. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 8.6 | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Superb consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that by driving the Skoda Superb over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 74 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1430 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 116 mm (4.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Superb can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Superb version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Skoda Superb 2019 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar XF engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar F-Pace, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Superb might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Skoda Superb engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Skoda Superb 2019 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Superb 2019 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Skoda Superb is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Superb is 9 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 625 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1760 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Jaguar XF may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Skoda Superb can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`043 kg | 2`370 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`395 kg | 1`760 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 648 kg | 610 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |