Skoda Superb 2019 vs Kia Optima 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Superb engine produces 49 HP more power than Kia Optima, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Kia Optima. Thanks to more power Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Optima is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Optima, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Superb consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Optima. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1520 km in combined cycle | |
| 1430 km on highway | 1660 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 1070 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Optima gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Superb and Kia Optima are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 660 litres | 553 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1950 litres | 1686 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Skoda Superb has 107 litres more trunk space than the Kia Optima. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Superb (by 264 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.2 metres more than that of the Kia Optima. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`327 kg | 2`150 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`612 kg | 1`560 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 715 kg | 590 kg | |
| Skoda Superb load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem more than Kia Optima. Therefore, Skoda Superb is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Kia Optima has
| |