Skoda Superb 2015 vs Volvo V90 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 HP | 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
| Skoda Superb engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo V90, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo V90. Despite less power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that by driving the Skoda Superb over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Superb consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 148 mm (5.8 inches) | 153 mm (6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Superb is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo V90, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 660 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1950 litres | 1526 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo V90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Superb (by 424 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo V90. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`275 kg | 2`400 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo V90 scores higher in safety tests, butSkoda Superb is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo V90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |