Skoda Superb 2015 vs BMW 5 series 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Superb engine produces 34 HP less power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 40 NM less than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the Skoda Superb over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Superb consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1460 km in combined cycle | 1340 km in combined cycle | |
| 1600 km on highway | 1480 km on highway | ||
| 1060 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 149 mm (5.9 inches) | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | |
| BMW 5 sērija 2013 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. Replacing the timing chain also requires removing the engine from ... More about BMW 5 sērija 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Superb is 5 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Superb is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 660 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1950 litres | 1670 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The BMW 5 series may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Superb (by 280 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Skoda Superb can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`085 kg | 2`460 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`445 kg | 1`840 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 640 kg | 620 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 5 series has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |