Skoda Superb 2015 vs Mercedes E class 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Mercedes E class is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Superb engine produces 54 HP less power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Mercedes E class. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that by driving the Skoda Superb over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Superb consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1460 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1600 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 1060 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Skoda Superb) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Mercedes E klase 2013 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Superb is 5 cm shorter than the Mercedes E class, 1 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Superb is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 660 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1905 litres | |
|
Mercedes E class has more luggage space. Skoda Superb has 35 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes E class. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`085 | 2`480 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Skoda Superb scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes E class has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |