Skoda Superb 2002 vs Chevrolet Evanda 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.8 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Skoda Superb is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 - 193 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 - 350 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 13.2 seconds | 10.7 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 10.9 | 8.8 - 9.6 | |
|
Skoda Superb petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Evanda. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
| Skoda Superb is 3 cm longer than the Chevrolet Evanda, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 1.4 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Evanda, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`538 | ~ 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Chevrolet Evanda has
| |