Skoda Superb 2013 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 3.6 | 1.8 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 260 HP | 152 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 350 NM | 250 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 10.1 seconds | 5.5 - 8.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 9.3 | 5.5 - 9.3 | |
|
Skoda Superb petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Passat CC. On average, Skoda Superb equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 595 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Superb has 63 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. The Volkswagen Passat CC may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`128 | ~ 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |