Skoda Superb 2013 vs Skoda Rapid 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Skoda Superb is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Skoda Rapid can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 3.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 260 HP | 75 - 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 350 NM | 112 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 10.1 seconds | 9.5 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 9.3 | 3.6 - 5.9 | |
|
Skoda Superb petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Rapid. On average, Skoda Superb equipped with diesel engines consume 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Skoda Superb is larger. Skoda Superb is 36 cm longer than the Skoda Rapid, 11 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 595 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1490 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Skoda Superb has 45 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.6 metres more than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`128 | ~ 1`667 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Superb is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Superb scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |