Skoda Superb 2010 vs Volkswagen Passat 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 3.6 (petrol, diesel) | 1.4 - 3.6 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 - 260 HP | 105 - 300 HP | |
Torque: | 200 - 350 NM | 200 - 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 - 10.6 seconds | 5.7 - 12.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 10.2 | 4.3 - 9.3 | |
Skoda Superb petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Passat. On average, Skoda Superb equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.77 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.51 m | 1.52 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Superb is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 633 litres | 603 litres | |
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Skoda Superb has 30 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Skoda Superb can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`143 | ~ 2`158 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 5800 | 4800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |