Skoda Superb 2013 vs Volkswagen Passat 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 3.6 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 260 HP | 120 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 350 NM | 200 - 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 10.1 seconds | 6.3 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 9.3 | 4.0 - 6.3 | |
|
Skoda Superb petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Passat. On average, Skoda Superb equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Superb is 7 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 603 litres | 651 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Skoda Superb has 48 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat. This could mean that the Skoda Superb uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`141 | ~ 2`094 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |