Skoda Scala 2020 vs Renault Megane 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Scala engine produces 50 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Skoda Scala reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 149 mm (5.9 inches) | 101 mm (4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Scala can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Scala version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Fabia, Seat Leon, Audi A1 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Scala might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Skoda Scala 2020 1.0 engine: The VW DLAA 1.0 TSI is a three-cylinder turbocharged gasoline engine produced at Volkswagen’s Czech plant from 2020 to 2024. It was later discontinued after stricter Euro 6e emissions requirements came into ... More about Skoda Scala 2020 1.0 engine Renault Megane 2020 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Skoda Scala is smaller, but higher. Skoda Scala and Renault Megane are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1410 litres | 1258 litres | |
|
Skoda Scala has more luggage capacity. Skoda Scala has 65 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Scala (by 152 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Scala is 1.2 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Skoda Scala can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`705 kg | 1`826 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`161 kg | 1`210 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 544 kg | 616 kg | |
| Skoda Scala load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Renault Megane. Therefore, Renault Megane is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Scala has
|
Renault Megane has
| |