Skoda Scala 2019 vs Renault Megane 2020
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Skoda Scala and Renault Megane have the same engine power, but Skoda Scala torque is 20 NM less than Renault Megane. Skoda Scala reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.6 | |
|
The Skoda Scala is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Scala consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Skoda Scala over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| Skoda Scala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 149 mm (5.9 inches) | 101 mm (4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Scala can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Scala version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Megane 2020 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Skoda Scala is smaller, but higher. Skoda Scala and Renault Megane are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1410 litres | 1258 litres | |
|
Skoda Scala has more luggage capacity. Skoda Scala has 65 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Scala (by 152 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Scala is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Megane. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`668 kg | 1`799 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`305 kg | 1`156 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 363 kg | 643 kg | |
| Skoda Scala load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 77 procentiem less than Renault Megane. Therefore, Renault Megane is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Scala has
|
Renault Megane has
| |