Skoda Scala 2019 vs Skoda Rapid 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 112 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Scala is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Scala engine produces 40 HP more power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 88 NM more than Skoda Rapid. Thanks to more power Skoda Scala reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.9 | |
|
The Skoda Scala is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Scala consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that by driving the Skoda Scala over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Scala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 149 mm (5.9 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Scala can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Scala version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
| Skoda Scala is 12 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 9 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Scala is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1410 litres | 1490 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space. Skoda Scala has 83 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 80 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Scala is 0.7 metres more than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Skoda Scala can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`668 kg | 1`595 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`305 kg | 1`135 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 363 kg | 460 kg | |
| Skoda Scala load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem less than Skoda Rapid. Therefore, Skoda Rapid is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Scala is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Scala scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Scala has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |