Skoda Scala 2019 vs Skoda Kamiq 2019
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Skoda Scala and Skoda Kamiq have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Skoda Scala reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Scala consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kamiq, which means that by driving the Skoda Scala over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Scala consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kamiq. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 149 mm (5.9 inches) | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Kamiq can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Kamiq version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.53 m | |
| Skoda Scala is 12 cm longer than the Skoda Kamiq, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Scala is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1410 litres | 1395 litres | |
|
Skoda Scala has more luggage capacity. Skoda Scala has 67 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Kamiq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Scala (by 15 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Scala is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Kamiq. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`668 kg | 1`710 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`305 kg | 1`156 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 363 kg | 554 kg | |
| Skoda Scala load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 53 procentiem less than Skoda Kamiq. Therefore, Skoda Kamiq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 19 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Scala has
|
Skoda Kamiq has
| |