Skoda Scala 2019 vs Citroen C4 2020
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Skoda Scala engine produces 15 HP less power than Citroen C4, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Citroen C4. Despite less power, Skoda Scala reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Scala is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Scala consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Scala could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Scala consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 149 mm (5.9 inches) | 197 mm (7.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Citroen C4 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Citroen C4 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Citroen C4 2020 1.2 engine: Since the timing belt is immersed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to excessive axial play in the ... More about Citroen C4 2020 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.52 m | |
| Skoda Scala and Citroen C4 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1410 litres | 1250 litres | |
|
Skoda Scala has more luggage capacity. Skoda Scala has 87 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Scala (by 160 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`668 kg | 1`755 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`305 kg | 1`278 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 363 kg | 477 kg | |
| Skoda Scala load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 31 procentiem less than Citroen C4. Therefore, Citroen C4 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 18 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Scala has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |