Skoda Scala 2019 vs Skoda Rapid 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 150 HP | 75 - 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 112 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 10.3 seconds | 9.5 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 5.0 | 3.6 - 5.9 | |
|
Skoda Scala petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Rapid. On average, Skoda Scala equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
| Skoda Scala is 12 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 9 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Scala is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1490 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space. Skoda Scala has 83 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`730 | ~ 1`667 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Scala is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Scala scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Scala has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |