Skoda Roomster 2006 vs Toyota Corolla 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Skoda Roomster engine produces 11 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Despite less power, Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that by driving the Skoda Roomster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Roomster consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Toyota Corolla 2004 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Corolla 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Skoda Roomster is smaller, but higher. Skoda Roomster is 21 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1780 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Corolla has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably better | ||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |