Skoda Roomster 2006 vs Peugeot 206 2002

 
Skoda Roomster
2006 - 2010
Peugeot 206
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 105 HP90 HP
Torque: 240 NM205 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds11.8 seconds
Skoda Roomster is more dynamic to drive.
Skoda Roomster engine produces 15 HP more power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Peugeot 206. Thanks to more power Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.45.1
Real fuel consumption: 5.8 l/100km5.7 l/100km
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Roomster could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Roomster consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
1190 km on highway1210 km on highway
940 km with real consumption870 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.20 m4.03 m
Width: 1.68 m1.65 m
Height: 1.61 m1.46 m
Skoda Roomster is larger.
Skoda Roomster is 17 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, 3 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 15 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 450 litres313 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1780 litres1136 litres
Skoda Roomster has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Roomster has 137 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Roomster (by 644 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters9.9 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.6 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Skoda Roomster can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7701`611
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Skoda Roomster has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 24001000
Pros and Cons: Skoda Roomster has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Peugeot 206 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv