Skoda Roomster 2006 vs Renault Clio 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Roomster is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Roomster engine produces 20 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Roomster could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Roomster consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Skoda Roomster is smaller, but higher. Skoda Roomster is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 439 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1780 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Roomster has 11 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The Renault Clio may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Renault Clio has
| |